Do we have too many telescopes ?
The STFC Ground Based Facilities Review is now well under way. There is an official GBFR web page, including a link to a well written consultation document, and an online questionnaire (did I spell that right ?) The deadline for responses is July 31st. There is related “Town Meeting” scheduled for July 9th. (Thanks to Peter for spotting my earlier date screw-up). The panel expects to publish a draft report by October 2nd; this schedule is designed to allow some chance of interaction with the US decadal survey.
Back in the 1990s I was on a PPARC review panel called the Ground Based Telescopes Development Panel (GBTDP). Everybody referred to it as the Ground Based Telescopes Destruction Panel. This time round the gloomy talk says the answer is already written : pull out of Gemini, close everything else except ESO membership, and pick ONE of ELT or SKA. Is that too pessimistic ? Is it in fact the right thing to do ? (See also Sarah’s post)
For sure, money is short and prospects poor. On top of STFC’s dodgy CLRC inheritance, we have a dodgy economy, subscriptions fixed in Euros with a falling pound, Research Councils faced with “efficiency savings”, a new Science Minister rumoured to be unconvinced by astronomy, and dark rumours of other problems. Furthermore, as the consultation document says upfront, there is no doubt we have a somewhat “overheated” ground based programme, for understandable historical reasons. Something has to go or we will look foolish as well as greedy. But it would be equally foolish to swing right through to the doom scenario where we have only ESO and ELT.
After reading the GBFR document, I felt the urge to boil down some of the figures to get the big picture. So here are some bottom line round figures in size order. These are rough ten year costs, even though some things might not have ten year lifetimes. The idea is just for very rough comparison. I have mixed up existing things, current requests, and likely future requests, and have used todays exchange rates.
- ESO incl ALMA : £212M
- ELT-UK £110M
- SKA-UK : £82M
- Gemini incl Oxford office : £60M
- eMERLIN : £24M (could reduce)
- 90% of UKIRT : £20M
- LSST-UK (guesstimate to 2020) £20M
- 55% of JCMT : £14M
- 33% of WHT+INT : £10M
- 40% of Liverpool Telescope : £5M
- SuperWASP : £4M
- 8% of Magdalena Ridge : £3M
- ALMA Reg. Centre : £3M
- Dark Energy Survey (DES) £2M
- LOFAR ops share £2M
- JIVE £1M
Note that the fractions are open public fractions – eg Iain Steele (see comment below after my original version) notes that most of the rest of LT is still for UK astronomers.
One way to group these numbers is :
- new big-tickets=210
- 4m-era legacy = 67
- small beer = 30
So the legacy+smalls represent 17% of the total. My guess is that they represent very good value for money … but they are our only margin.